A research group represented by Dr. Teguh Kurniawan, Associate Professor of Faculty of Administrative Sciences, University of Indonesia, and Ms. Patralekha Chatterjee, a senior urban journalist from the magazine Citiscope, visited Jakarta, Indonesia, from Sept 3 to 6, to draw on the city’s experiences in urban planning. Officials from the secretariat of United Cities and Local Governments Asia-Pacific (UCLG-ASPAC) and a staff member of the Guangzhou International Award for Urban Innovation (Guangzhou Award) also joined this peer review tour. Jakarta’s Participatory Planning and Good Governance, an initiative focusing on a participatory society placing people in the main role of a city’s development, added Jakarta, Indonesia into the 15 shortlisted cities in the third cycle of Guangzhou Award in 2016. The research group was briefed on Jakarta’s community involvement in urban planning during discussions and exchanges with officials at the Regional Development Planning Agency of Jakarta Capital City Government, Smart City Department, and the E-Musrenbang system developer. They also gained a close-up view of the specific processes and development trends of the initiative.
A research group from the Guangzhou International Award for Urban Innovation meets with the Smart City Department for Participatory Planning and Good Governance initiative, in Jakarta, Indonesia, on Sept 4. Photo provided to guangzhouaward.org During their four-day field trip, the research group also visited community in the city’s sub-district, and carried out a mini workshop to capture updated information and first-hand data regarding the initiative, by meeting with representative of local official, community leader and local resident, and provide their suggestions on how to improve the scheme. In addition, a transitional participatory planning submitted by Christchurch in New Zealand, the winning city of the 2014 Guangzhou Award, and Guangzhou’s successful experience on rural planning project were also shared as case studies in the workshop. Regional planning head Tuty Kusumawati says most proposals put forward by residents through the e-musrenbang process are accepted and funded. (Patralekha Chatterjee) So city leaders added a digital component to the process, known as. Proposals decided upon at the local-level meetings are submitted to city government through the web-based application. It’s the repository of aspirations residents have for their communities — in 2016, Jakarta city government received more than 46,000 proposals from the public.
Contoh Format Telaahan Staf Polri. Posted: adminOn 5/29/2018. Contoh Format Telaahan Staf. Demikian Telaahan Staf ini dibuat. Melihat bahwa kegiatan Penataan PNS tidak tertata dalam APBD Pemerintah Kota Manado Tahun 2012. Contoh Telaahan Staf Penataan Pns Diunggah oleh Yeldy Rogahang Upaya mensukseskan Reformasi Birokrasi dengan mengoptimalkan kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia dari aspek kuantitas, kualitas, komposisi dan distribusi Pegawai yang tepat sesuai kebutuhan tiap SKPD di.
The platform is also a tracking mechanism, so that the public can easily check on the progress of their suggestions. If the proposal is rejected, local officials must give a reason why.
According to Tuty Kusumawati, head of Jakarta’s Regional Development Planning Board, 76 percent of the proposals from the community are accepted, validated and funded for implementation. This bottom-up process works alongside the more traditional top-down planning and budgeting systems driven by local government agencies, says Andhika Ajie, a planner and analyst with the Province of Jakarta Special Capital Region. “The head of the sub-district should know the real needs of the people,” he says.
“The proposals are verified by the sub-district and then the district authorities. The idea is to combine technocratic planning by municipalities with citizens’ ideas.” According to Ajie, having the Qlue app as a separate platform for handling day-to-day complaints has helped improve the dialogue between residents and planners.
“Previously, citizens used to submit proposals which combined complaints needing immediate redress with long-term demands,” he says. “Now we have separated it.
Qlue deals with complaints and the proposals are fed into e-muserenbang. If there is garbage lying around somewhere, all that a Jakartan has to do is to click a photo and report it. Within 24 hours, it will be removed.” Tracking progress In Cipete Utara, a middle-class neighbourhood in South Jakarta, residents and community leaders generally offered a positive assessment of the changes. “The most interesting part of e-musrenbang is that now we can actually track online the status of our community proposals,” says Yostiana Bella Ulfa, 25, who has lived in Cipete Utara all her life. “If any suggestion is refused, we are also told the reasons. If it has been accepted, we can track various stages of implementation.”. Community leader Iyus Ruslan Said: Roads, sewers and infrastructure “are on top of the mind of most people.” (Patralekha Chatterjee) She says she was “thrilled” recently when a proposal from the neighbourhood committee to fix a number of streets pocked with potholes was acted upon quickly.
“In Jakarta, we use motorcycles a lot, especially in narrow lanes,” Ulfa says. “Commuting becomes a big problem if the lanes are badly in need of repair.” Yostiana’s father, Iyus Ruslan Said, a 50-year old businessman, heads the local neighbourhood committee. He says e-musrenbang has been helpful in communicating and tracking the progress on the community’s main demands, which relate to repairs of roads, sewers and other infrastructure. “These physical bottlenecks are on top of the mind of most people,” he says.
However, older residents and many community leaders are still trying to adapt to technology, he says. Much more needs to be done to spread awareness of the e-musrenbang process.
“The sudden change has been a cultural shock,” according to Said, “because there is a big difference between the process earlier and now.” Mohammed Yohan, head of the Cipete Utara Sub-District, agrees that it has been a change. But in his view, it’s largely a change for the better. “Earlier, it was more difficult to track status of proposals to the city government,” he recalls. “We have seen angry community members throwing chairs, frustrated at not knowing the status of some proposals made for benefit of the community. Now any citizen with a can track proposals in real time. It is the culture of open data.” Spreading awareness Participatory urban planning in Jakarta is not just about technology.
It’s also about finding new ways to tap resources and energy in the community. In Cipete Utara, the sub-district office sits alongside a preschool.
Recently, PT. Agung Sedayu, a real estate development company, turned the area next door into a park for children and an activity centre offering classes from dancing to drawing. There’s a small library, three toilets, a lactation room, basketball court and small amphitheatre. The project was part of the company’s corporate social responsibility efforts. It is maintained by the company and the local community.
Planner Andhika Ajie: “The idea is to combine technocratic planning with citizens’ ideas.” (Patralekha Chatterjee) Inside the complex is something called a “waste bank”. Residents drop off old newspapers, plastic bottles and other trash, and 120 women volunteers who work here turn the waste into toys and craft items. “Every three months, I hold meetings with mothers who drop by and other volunteers,” says Sri Hastuti Sugiyono, the waste bank’s director. “We discuss what sort of products we should make out of the trash — and which would sell.” Citizens are the ones who proposed these new facilities, says Yohan. Because the ideas rose up through a participatory process involving not just residents but the private sector and local NGOs, the company and the community found a way to pitch in and make it happen.
Teguh Kurniawan, an associate professor at the University of Indonesia, says the most interesting part of Jakarta’s approach is the direct participation of citizens. “The challenge now,” he says, “is in spreading awareness about the benefits of these innovative measures, spreading the message among the public at large and ensuring that community leaders adapt to technology.” Kurniawan adds that it’s important to recognize that access to technology and internet connectivity is not uniform across the city — especially in poorer neighbourhoods, there will be teething problems. In addition, since e-musrenbang requires a Jakarta ID to submit proposals, a large number of transient residents aren’t able to use it. At the same time, Kurniawan notes that Jakarta’s population is mostly literate and that these innovations have great potential to positively impact the daily lives of most city residents. A play area outside a preschool was built by a private company after community members requested it through the e-musrenbang process. (Patralekha Chatterjee) For tech-savvy younger residents, Qlue is an especially big hit.
The app, launched in 2014, came about through a partnership between the municipal government and a local software company. With Qlue, more and more Jakartans are reporting problems that occur in their neighbourhood in real time by clicking a photo, geo-tagging the location, offering a brief status report. People without smartphones can use SMS. Yohan points to a street lamp nearby as an example of an improvement suggested through all of Jakarta’s new feedback tools.
Using Qlue, lots of residents complained of dark alleys that made them feel unsafe. Using e-musrenbang, they asked for more street lamps — the city has installed more than 600 street lamps in Cipete Utara through that process. “It was proposed, accepted and implemented,” Yohan says.
“In all, there were 119 proposals from residents of this sub-district. All but one were accepted.” (Travel costs associated with reporting for this story were paid for by the Guangzhou International Award for Urban Innovation.) Source.
On June 15, 2017, I successfully defended my dissertation in an open examination of doctoral promotion of the Universitas Indonesia led by the Dean of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. In the defense, I presented my dissertation entitled “Isu Diskresi dalam Kasus Korupsi Kepala Daerah yang Ditangani oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi pada Periode 2004-2010 dan Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap” or “Issues on Discretion in Corruption Case by Head of Regions that Handled by the Corruption Eradication Commission in 2004-2010 and have permanent legal force” The dissertation summary in Bahasa Indonesia can be accessed. Ini adalah artikel lama saya yang ditulis pada tahun 2011. Abstrak. Hong Kong merupakan contoh terbaik di dunia yang berhasil mentransformasikan diri dari korupsi yang merajalela di tahun 1960an menjadi pemerintahan yang bersih di tahun 1970an. Hong Kong berhasil mempertahankan peringkat yang konsisten sebagai salah satu wilayah “terbersih” di dunia sejak 1980 dan bertahan selama beberapa dekade. Keberhasilan ICAC dalam menjadikan Hong Kong seperti sekarang telah menjadikannya sebagai model peran dari badan anti korupsi yang paling efektif dan ingin ditiru oleh banyak negara di dunia.
Tulisan ini mencoba untuk menggambarkan bagaimana ICAC berperan dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Hong Kong; faktor-faktor yang menjadi penentu keberhasilan ICAC; serta pembelajaran yang dapat diambil oleh Indonesia, terkait dengan keberadaan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Untuk mencapai tujuan yang diinginkan, tulisan ini mengandalkan kepada data dan informasi dari berbagai dokumen dan literatur yang relevan.
Dari berbagai data dan informasi tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa upaya Hong Kong untuk menjadikan wilayahnya sebagai salah satu wilayah yang bebas korupsi bukanlah tanpa upaya dan hambatan. ICAC dapat membawa Hong Kong pada kondisi sekarang melalui dukungan politik yang kuat dari pemerintah dan masyarakatnya. Selain itu, ICAC memiliki strategi yang terencana, terpadu, holistik dan konsisten sehingga dapat berkontribusi secara signifikan dalam mengubah budaya korupsi yang ada pada masyarakat Hong Kong. Keywords: Hong Kong ICAC, Pemberantasan Korupsi, KPK Ini tautan untuk full artikelnya. Below are my list of publications and the link for downloading it. You can also download my publications from Books. Kurniawan, Teguh, Ima Mayasari & Umniah Salsabila Prasojo, 2018, Hutan Privat di Indonesia: Belajar dari Pengalaman “Hutan Organik” Megamendung, Depok: FIA UI Press, ISBN: 734.
ASEAN and Asia Studies Center (AASC), National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) Thailand, 2015, Comparative Politics in ASEAN, Bangkok: Semadhama Publishing House. ISBN: 014. Prasojo, Eko dkk, 2015, Pemerintahan Daerah, Buku Materi Pokok, Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka (Regional Government). ISBN: 987.
Prasojo, Eko et.al, 2010, Dampak Desentralisasi terhadap Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam dan Kerusakan Lingkungan, Depok, Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI (The Impact of Decentralization on the Utilization of Natural Resources and Environmental Degradation). ISBN: 331. Wibawa, Samodara (Editor), 2009, Administrasi Negara: Isu-Isu Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. ISBN: 015.
Sumarno (Editor), 2009, Perempuan di Lembaga Legislatif: Panduan Bagi Perempuan Menjadi Anggota Legislatif, Jakarta: The Habibie Center and Hanns Seidel Foundation (Women in Legislative Institutions: Guidance for Women when Become Legislative Member). ISBN: 110.
Prasojo, Eko, Irfan Ridwan Maksum, Epakartika, and Teguh Kurniawan, 2007, Deregulasi & Debirokratisasi Perizinan di Indonesia, Depok: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI (Deregulation & De-bureaucratization of Permits in Indonesia). ISBN: 614. Prasojo, Eko, Teguh Kurniawan, and Defny Holidin, 2007, State Reform in Indonesia, Depok Administrative Sciences Department Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Indonesia. ISBN: 607. Prasojo, Eko, Teguh Kurniawan and Defny Holidin, 2007, Reformasi & Inovasi Birokrasi: Studi di Kabupaten Sragen, Jakarta: Yappika & Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI, (Bureaucratic Reform & Innovation: Case Study in Regency of Sragen). ISBN: 206.
Prasojo, Eko, dkk, 2007, Pemerintahan Daerah, Buku Materi Pokok, Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka (Regional Government). ISBN: 979011110X. Kurniawan, Teguh (editor), 2006, Kinerja Pelayanan Publik: Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja, Keterlibatan dan Partisipasi dalam Pelayanan Bidang Pendidikan, Kesehatan dan Kependudukan, Jakarta: Yappika, (Public Services Performance: Community Perception on Performance, Involvement and Participation in Education, Health and Population Administration System Sectors). ISBN:. Prasojo, Eko, Irfan Ridwan Maksum and Teguh Kurniawan, 2006, Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah: Antara Model Demokrasi Lokal dan Efisiensi Struktural, Depok: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI (Decentralization & Local Governance: Between Local Democracy and Structural Efficiency Models). ISBN:.
Prasojo, Eko, Teguh Kurniawan & Azwar Hasan, 2004, Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Praktek: Kasus di Kabupaten Jembrana, Depok: Pusat Kajian Pembangunan Administrasi Daerah dan Kota (Bureaucratic Reformation in Practices: A Case from the Regency of Jembrana). Available at: Journal Articles. Kurniawan, Teguh, Muh Azis Muslim & Eko Sakapurnama, “Regulatory impact assessment and its challenges: An empirical analysis from Indonesia”. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences (Scopus Indexed, ISSN: 2452-3151), Vol. 1, January-April 2018, pp 105-108. Available at. Kurniawan, Teguh & Fibria Indriati, “Introduction: Collaborative Governance in Dynamic Public-Private-Society Relations to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals”, Development and Society (Scopus Indexed, ISSN: 1598-8074), Vol.
3, December 2017, pp 421-426. Available at. Kurniawan, Teguh, Eko Prasojo & Gunadi, “Corruptive Behavior of the Heads of Local Governments in Indonesia”, Halduskultuur / Administrative Culture (Scopus Indexed, ISSN: 1736-6070, E-ISSN: 1736-6089), Vol. 1, 2017, pp 73-87.
Available at. Ndaru, Felix Aglen & Teguh Kurniawan, “Corporate Social Responsibility Partnership to Alleviate Poverty in Kulon Progo Regency”, Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 3, September 2015, pp 145-155.
Available at. Santoso, Tulus & Teguh Kurniawan, “Analisis Kinerja Bagian Pengaduan Masyarakat Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI” (Performance Analysis of Public Complaints Sections of General Secretary of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia), Mimbar (ISSN: 028-175, EISSN 2303-2499), Vol. 1, Juni 2015, pp 167-176. Available at. Zakiyah, Isnaeni Nur & Teguh Kurniawan, “Kajian Pembangunan Pariwisata Pantai suwuk Kabupaten Kebumen ditinjau dari Partisipasi Masyarakat: Studi pada Masyarakat Dukuh Suwuk Desa Tambakmulya” (Tourism Development in Suwuk Beach Regency of Kebumen from the Perspectives on Citizen Participation: Study on Citizen of Suwuk Hamlet of Tambakmulya Village), Pariwisata (Tourism, Scientific Journal, ISSN: 1411-1527), Vol.
2 Juli 2014, Available at. Asterina, Nina & Teguh Kurniawan, “The Policy Implementation of Modern Market Land-Use Control in Municipality of Cirebon”, Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 3 September 2013, pp 137-143. Available at:. Kurniawan, Teguh, “Paradoks Implementasi Good Governance Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Inovasi Daerah: Kasus di Kota Parepare” (Paradox in the Implementation of Good Governance on Regional Innovation Program: Case in Municipality of Parepare), Analisis CSIS (ISSN: 1829-5908), Vol. 1, Maret 2013, pp 131-160.
Kurniawan, Teguh, “Peranan Akuntabilitas Publik dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Pemerintahan: Perspektif Teoritis” (The Role of Public Accountability and Citizen Participation on Eradication of Corruption at Governments: Theoretical Perspectives), Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 2 Mei 2009, pp 112-116. Available at:. Kurniawan, Teguh, “After the 2009 Election: Some Suggestions to Improve Capacity of Regional Government Apparatus in SBY-Boediono Administration”, PostScript (ISSN: 2087-1619), Vol. 4, July-August 2009, pp 17-23. Kurniawan, Teguh, “Pergeseran Paradigma Administrasi Publik: Dari Perilaku Model Klasik dan NPM ke Good Governance” (Shifting Paradigm in Public Administration: From Classical Model Behaviour and NPM to Good Governance), Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara—JIANA (Public Administration Journal, ISSN: 1411-948X), Vol. 1 Januari 2007, pp 52-70.
Kurniawan, Teguh, “Masalah dan Tantangan dalam Pengelolaan Jakarta: Aspek Populasi, Ruang Muka Bumi dan Infrastruktur Kota” (Problems and Challenge in Managing Jakarta: Population, Land Space and City Infrastructure Aspects), Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 4 December 2006, pp 732-743. Kurniawan, Teguh, “Kepemerintahan Kawasan Metropolitan: Sumbangan Pemikiran untuk Revisi UU 34/1999” (Metropolitan Governance: Critical Though for Revision of law 34/1999), Jurnal Industri dan Perkotaan (Journal of Industry and Urban, ISSN: 1410-3575), Vol. 18, August 2006, pp 1188-1207. Available at:. Kurniawan, Teguh, “Perbaikan Pelayanan Publik di Era Otonomi: Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan” (Improvement of Public Services in the Era of Local Autonomy: between Hope and Reality), Aliansi (ISSN: 1412-5927), Media for Strengthening Civil Society published by YAPPIKA Foundation, Vol.
![Contoh Telaah Staf Pns 2018 Contoh Telaah Staf Pns 2018](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125633678/736321729.png)
XXXI, January 2006. Prasojo, Eko & Teguh Kurniawan., “Bebas Iuran Sekolah dan JKJ: Inovasi Pro Masyarakat Miskin di Jembrana” (No School Fee and Jembrana Health Insurance: Innovation Pro Poor Community in Jembrana), Paper, submitted in Research Competition on Poverty 2004 held by World Bank Jakarta Office and selected as top 10 papers (finalists). This article also published in Jurnal PSPK (Journal of Development Areas Study Center, ISSN: 1412-3479), VIII edition, 2006, pp 100-135. Prasojo, Eko, Teguh Kurniawan & Azwar Hasan, “Efisiensi Anggaran Sebagai Faktor Kunci Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan Program Inovasi di Kabupaten Jembrana” (Budget Efficiency as Key Success Factor in the Implementation of Innovation Program in the Regency of Jembrana), Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal, ISSN: 1978-7243), published by Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Brawijaya University, Vol. 2, March-August 2005, pp 77-189. Prasojo, Eko, Teguh Kurniawan & Azwar Hasan, “Peran Kepemimpinan dalam Program Inovasi Daerah: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Jembrana” (The Role of Leadership in the Local Innovation Program: A Case Study from Regency of Jembrana), Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 3 September 2004, pp 52-60.
Kurniawan, Teguh., “Manajemen Kota Berkelanjutan di Indonesia: Indikator dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Kebijakan Kota Berkelanjutan oleh Pemerintah Kota di Indonesia: Studi Kasus pada Kota Depok, Bogor, dan Bandung” (Sustainable City Management in Indonesia: Indicators for Developing Sustainable City Policies by Municipality Governments in Indonesia: a Case Study from Municipalities of Depok, Bogor, and Bandung), Bisnis & Birokrasi (Journal Business & Bureaucracy, ISSN: 0854-3844), Vol. 1 January 2003, pp 28-36 Publications on Social Science Research Networks (SSRN). Asterina, Nina and Teguh Kurniawan, The Policy Implementation of Modern Market Land-Use Control in Municipality of Cirebon (March 17, 2015). Available at SSRN:. Kurniawan, Teguh, Regional Governments, Good Governance and Corruption Eradication in Indonesia (December 25, 2012).
Available at SSRN: or. Kurniawan, Teguh, ICT Development and Regional Governments Transparency in Indonesia: Some Issues and Prospects (October 23, 2011).
EROPA 2011, Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration, 23rd General Assembly and Conference, October 2011.